Device performance under OpenWrt

The same measurement across every ported device, so one board can be compared with another on identical firmware.

Two frame sizes are published here. At 1400 B the gigabit cable itself runs out first -- 1424 B of wire time per frame caps any device on the link at about 87.8 thousand frames per second -- so that is the scale a figure at this size is read against, and these points are shown as bandwidth. Whether a given bar is AT that ceiling or far below it is what the bar itself says: a device that reaches the cable's limit and one that stops at a tenth of it are both drawn here, and the caption claims nothing about which is which. At 60 B the link is far from full, so those points stay in packets per second. The unit is chosen per chart and printed beside every figure. Every size the suite measures, and every qualifier each figure was measured with, stays in the dated artifact these pages are generated from.

DHCP LAN->WAN, 60 B frames

G24W 341k pps X111W 432k pps X400AXF 413k pps

DHCP WAN->LAN, 60 B frames

G24W 989k pps X111W 995k pps X400AXF 879k pps

DHCP+VLAN LAN->WAN, 60 B frames

G24W 27.5k pps X111W 66.0k pps X400AXF 418k pps

DHCP+VLAN WAN->LAN, 60 B frames

G24W 307k pps X111W 118k pps X400AXF 285k pps

PPPoE CHAP LAN->WAN, 60 B frames

G24W 26.3k pps X111W 60.1k pps X400AXF 95.6k pps

PPPoE CHAP WAN->LAN, 60 B frames

G24W 102k pps X111W 201k pps X400AXF 145k pps

PPPoE CHAP+VLAN LAN->WAN, 60 B frames

G24W 25.4k pps X111W 56.9k pps X400AXF 100k pps

PPPoE CHAP+VLAN WAN->LAN, 60 B frames

X111W 68.3k pps X400AXF 195k pps

PPPoE PAP LAN->WAN, 60 B frames

G24W 26.8k pps X111W 58.7k pps X400AXF 109k pps

PPPoE PAP WAN->LAN, 60 B frames

X111W 61.6k pps X400AXF 78.5k pps

PPPoE PAP+VLAN LAN->WAN, 60 B frames

G24W 24.6k pps X111W 59.8k pps X400AXF 108k pps

PPPoE PAP+VLAN WAN->LAN, 60 B frames

G24W 89.3k pps X111W 63.5k pps X400AXF 167k pps

DHCP LAN->WAN, 1400 B frames

G24W 982 Mbps X111W 983 Mbps X400AXF 983 Mbps

DHCP WAN->LAN, 1400 B frames

G24W 983 Mbps X111W 983 Mbps X400AXF 983 Mbps

DHCP+VLAN LAN->WAN, 1400 B frames

G24W 232 Mbps X111W 727 Mbps X400AXF 982 Mbps

DHCP+VLAN WAN->LAN, 1400 B frames

G24W 348 Mbps X111W 638 Mbps X400AXF 657 Mbps

PPPoE CHAP LAN->WAN, 1400 B frames

G24W 229 Mbps X111W 641 Mbps X400AXF 382 Mbps

PPPoE CHAP WAN->LAN, 1400 B frames

G24W 235 Mbps X111W 565 Mbps X400AXF 78.3 Mbps

PPPoE CHAP+VLAN LAN->WAN, 1400 B frames

G24W 223 Mbps X111W 630 Mbps X400AXF 744 Mbps

PPPoE CHAP+VLAN WAN->LAN, 1400 B frames

X111W 562 Mbps X400AXF 535 Mbps

PPPoE PAP LAN->WAN, 1400 B frames

G24W 231 Mbps X111W 643 Mbps X400AXF 432 Mbps

PPPoE PAP WAN->LAN, 1400 B frames

G24W 188 Mbps X111W 566 Mbps X400AXF 123 Mbps

PPPoE PAP+VLAN LAN->WAN, 1400 B frames

G24W 211 Mbps X111W 626 Mbps X400AXF 558 Mbps

PPPoE PAP+VLAN WAN->LAN, 1400 B frames

G24W 541 Mbps X111W 582 Mbps X400AXF 437 Mbps

WiFi

Every device is charted at each operating point it was measured at, so a newer radio shows the advantage it actually delivers. Each bar names its own operating point -- band, width, standard and cipher; the channel is recorded per measurement in the dated artifact, and is left off the bar because at one band, width, standard and cipher two channels negotiate the same thing -- beside its figure, because bars on one chart may have been taken at different points; where they differ, the gap between them includes that difference and no percentage is claimed. These are end-to-end figures over the device's own WAN, not an isolated radio measurement, and the client, the channel and the air are in them too. A device with no WiFi does not appear here at all.

WiFi -> WAN -- DHCP, 1400 B frames

X400AXF 139 Mbps 2g/40MHz/HE/CCMP

WiFi -> WAN -- DHCP, 1400 B frames

X400AXF 37.4 Mbps 5g/80MHz/HE/CCMP

WAN -> WiFi -- DHCP, 1400 B frames

X400AXF 158 Mbps 2g/40MHz/HE/CCMP

WAN -> WiFi -- DHCP, 1400 B frames

X400AXF 335 Mbps 5g/80MHz/HE/CCMP

WAN -> WiFi -- DHCP, 1400 B frames

X400AXF 579 Mbps 5g/80MHz/HE/CCMP

WiFi -> WAN -- TCP max

X400AXF 613 Mbps 5g/80MHz/HE/CCMP

WAN -> WiFi -- TCP max

X400AXF 343 Mbps 5g/80MHz/HE/CCMP

WiFi latency

Round-trip delay over the air, at the 95th percentile -- the tail a user actually notices, not the average. Lower is better on these charts, the opposite of every chart above, so the bars are drawn in a different colour and each states the direction. Each bar names its own operating point. The idle chart is the floor; the loaded ones show what happens to it while another device is using the same radio, which is the case a shared medium makes worst.

WiFi -> WAN, idle

X111W 16798 ms 2g/20MHz/HT/CCMP lower is better: these bars are milliseconds of delay, so a SHORTER bar is the better device

11 WiFi latency point(s) on G24W, X111W, X400AXF carry no figure that can be placed beside another device's: the point is BLOCKED on this device -- nothing was measured, so there is no figure to place on an axis

Among the WiFi points published here, 49 further WiFi point(s) on G24W, X111W, X400AXF carry no figure that can be placed beside another device's: the cell CONTRADICTS ITSELF as a maximum: it delivered 0.2% of the rate its own radio negotiated -- below the 5.0% floor -- and records limited_by='unknown', i.e. its own producer says nothing in evidence explains the figure. A maximum nobody can account for is not a capability; it is a failure with a number attached. It stays in the dated artifact with every field it was measured with.; the cell CONTRADICTS ITSELF as a maximum: it delivered 1.9% of the rate its own radio negotiated -- below the 5.0% floor -- and records limited_by='unknown', i.e. its own producer says nothing in evidence explains the figure. A maximum nobody can account for is not a capability; it is a failure with a number attached. It stays in the dated artifact with every field it was measured with.; the point is BLOCKED on this device -- nothing was measured, so there is no figure to place on an axis